Enterprise Software Development

Buy, if a product already does 80% of what you need and you can live with the other 20%. Custom makes sense when the process is your advantage, when no product fits the way you actually work, or when licence costs per seat have overtaken what building would cost. We'll say which one you're in before quoting.

Anything a company runs internally rather than sells — the platform your operations live in, the tools that move work between departments, the reporting the business is managed by. Size of company matters less than whether the software is load-bearing.

It depends on how many workflows and how many systems have to connect. Integrations are usually the largest line — connecting to what already exists costs more than building the new screens. We scope after discovery and give a fixed number for a defined set of workflows.

That's the more useful question than how long development takes. A first workflow can be live in weeks; full replacement of a system a department depends on is measured in months, because it happens in stages while the old one keeps running.

It keeps running until the new one is doing its job. We migrate in pieces and keep both paths working through the transition. Switching everything over on a Friday night is how enterprise projects end up on the news.

By involving them before the design is finished, migrating their real data rather than asking them to re-enter it, and making the new way faster than the old one for the tasks they do most. Training helps, but it doesn't rescue software that's slower than a spreadsheet.

Yes, and it's usually easier that way. We work inside your environment — your repositories, your accounts, your access policies — so security review happens alongside development instead of blocking it at the end.